October 09, 2013
Continuing our coverage of state Initiative 522, in this three-part series, our own Dan Langager dives into the heated, and costly, debate over labeling genetically engineered foods. Monday’s first installment covered the main tenets of the For and Against campaigns with representatives from the two contentious coalitions. In Tuesday's second report, Dan explored how this initiative could affect farmers, and how they fund and deliver their products. In today’s third installment, Dan uncovers who’s been funding the campaigns for and against 522 and whether or not Washington is at risk in leading the charge on labeling genetically engineered foods.