April 15, 2011
The debate over cutting the national debt is a
senseless discussion in the current form. There is no way to reduce the national debt by exclusively considering
expenditures. At some point, a wise politician needs to admit ‘the king has no clothes’ and
acknowledge tax revenue must be increased. Taxes have been so demonized that neither party will even use the word.
The Republican Party has made the subject of debt reduction and tax elimination their pacifier to sooth their
It is no secret that the Republican Party is totally against most social
programs especially as they relate to those earning less than $80,000 annually. The Republicans are using the
issue of debt reduction tied to social programs to take credit for saving the financially powerful and eliminating
those considered freeloaders. We again have a situation in which the Conservative Right is using perception
management, repeating cute words and phrases to make the voters believe cutting programs designated
‘social’ will magically eliminate the debt. Progress on debt reduction is impossible if we can’t
even pay the interest on our debt. That sounds too much like the Chelan PUD and the fiber program. Has anyone
checked the number of Republicans on the Chelan PUD nonpartisan Board?
Party isn’t much better. Democrats do have the compassion to see the need to care for our neighbors and
understand that self regulation is a fantasy. However, rather than being more forceful in their convictions the
Democrats seem to take the approach that the Republicans will, over time, come around after listening to their
lectures. We can’t afford to wait until the oceans die from oil pollution or our food supply dwindles from
climate change. We can’t wait until the middle class bankrupts the health care system by going to the public
hospital emergency rooms unable to afford privatized health insurance. Privatization generates profits,
It is interesting how Paul Ryan, Chairman of the House Budget committee,
can submit a budget to solve the debt issues by reducing taxes for the financially powerful and seriously
curtailing many programs that energize and motivate 85% of our citizens. How are the bills going to be
paid? Do we just ignore the homeless, the sick and the hungry? Paul Ryan’s proposal is like suggesting that
the parents, who generate the family income, pay no support to their children but demand their children pay rent,
pay for health care and buy the family food. Representative Ryan wants to develop an ideal society, totally free
from regulations, impose no taxes on the financially powerful, all based on the conviction that self regulation
and privatization of pensions and health care will save our society. His approach is a formula for disaster. Paul
needs to study history not write childish fantasies.
This is Werner Janssen, celebrating
the opportunity to express one person’s opinion. I hope my thoughts will stimulate your own thinking.